The 1970 Protests & Violence at the University of New Mexico

Login

Objectives

Protest, civil disobedience, war, and the right to a free press are all threads that are woven through the tapestry of United States history. This module uses samples from the New Mexico Museum of Art’s photography collection to tug on those threads through documentary photography. The images depict locations and events on the campus of the University of New Mexico in May of 1970 when protests against the Vietnam War began. This module explores the national events leading up to the protests on the UNM campus, the methods employed by the protesters, and the response brought to those protests.

Key Questions

  • When is protest and different responses on behalf of the state used, and why?
  • What is the value of documenting these events?
  • Who decides what gets told as history, and what interests may decide that?

Key Skills

  1. Discussion
  2. Critical Thinking
  3. Visual Literacy

Cross-curricular Connections

  • History
  • Politics
  • Visual Art
  • Media Studies

Lesson Plan

A short history of the 1970 protests at the University of New Mexico is provided below. Teachers should feel free to use this as a lecture resource or draw from it in any way that they find useful. This text provides an overview of the chronology of events that happened on the UNM Campus and a brief review of the events at Kent State University and the state of protest around the Vietnam War. Photographs from the collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art provide additional visual information and help to frame questions about the role of documenting such events. While the events depicted are from 1970, the questions about protest, reactions to protest, and the role of documenting such events can be used as a basis for discussion about more recent events.

Related Artwork

A man stands between two people (a man and a woman), his arms outstretched to push them away from each other. He is holding on the man's wrist, and the woman is grabbing his arm. A group of people stand to the side.
Unknown maker, Rally at Yale Park, 1970, gelatin silver print, 6 × 9 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.3).
National Guardsmen stand in a group with bayonets out. A person stands in fornt of them with their arms extended..
Unknown maker, Untitled (Lone Student Challenges Guardsmen), 1970, gelatin silver print, 4 3/8 × 6 5/8 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.21).
National Guardsmen are wearing gas masks and holding bayonets as they march towards the photographer.
Unknown maker, Untitled (Guardsmen March Toward Strikers), 1970, gelatin silver print, 9 1/4 × 6 1/4 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.10).
Medics lift wounded striker into ambulance. Striker is covered with sheet and bound to stretcher.
Unknown maker, Untitled (Medics Lift Wounded Striker), 1970, gelatin silver print, 9 1/2 × 6 1/4 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.12).
A striker wearing a vest with two decorative pins holds his right hand to his head and looks distressed. Other onlookers and tree canopy visible behind him.
Unknown maker, Untitled (Dazed Striker), 1970, gelatin silver print, 6 × 9 1/4 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.13).
Police officers stand in a line outside the Student Union, holding batons out.
Unknown maker, Untitled (Police Guard the Campus), 1970, gelatin silver print, 9 1/2 × 5 7/8 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.18).
Police officers stand in a tight line, while an officer walks along the arrangement.
Unknown maker, Untitled (Police with Batons), 1970, gelatin silver print, 6 × 9 3/8 in. Collection of the New Mexico Museum of Art. Gift of Paige Pinnell, 2011 (2011.14.19).

The 1970 Protests at the University of New Mexico

In 1970, American involvement in the Vietnam War showed little signs of abating. Many viewed the war as an improper invasion of an independent country and a waste of American and civilian lives. In the United States, opposition to the war was especially widespread among the younger generation, as well as among progressives and civil rights advocates. When President Nixon ordered an invasion of Cambodia, on April 31st, 1970, it sparked a series of nationwide student protests, which grew into one of the largest protest movements in U.S. history. On May 4th, 1970, student protests on the Kent State University campus ended in violence after the Ohio National Guard was called in. The Guard fired upon the protesters, killing four and injuring multiple people. This led to further outrage and action on behalf of the student protesters. On the same day, Jane Fonda, the actress and anti-war activist, spoke at the University of New Mexico and advocated for peaceful protest against the war. An all-student strike was called to begin on May 6th to protest both the war and the killings at Kent State.

Marches began to take place a day earlier, on May 5th, with around 250 students marching on the Air Force ROTC building and 75 occupying it. The question of calling in the National Guard was raised by Gov. David Cargo in response to the occupation of the ROTC building, but the idea was rejected by University President Ferrel Heady. President Heady instructed students to leave the building by 6 AM, May 6th, threatening arrest if they didn’t comply, and the students departed by the morning, ending the occupation peacefully and avoiding arrest.

The majority of the university administration opposed the May 6th strike, and President Heady initially refused to close down the campus in accordance with the strike leaders’ requests. Gov. Cargo issued a warning that if student protesters interrupted the Republican National Governor’s Conference being held in Albuquerque, he would have them “run out” by the National Guard. The goal of the movement was to force the administration and state government to take action against the war. A notable moment on the first day involved nearly 800 students marching upon the anthropology lecture hall, blocking a biology exam from occurring. The strike was intended to be nonviolent, but it quickly escalated, with a stabbing over a dispute about the lowering of the American flag, and a later incident in which a man drove his car into a crowd of protesters, injuring four. The school administration closed the campus in response to the stabbing. A large group of strikers began occupying the Student Union shortly afterward the campus closure and remained there until May 7th. According to student newspapers at the time, strike leaders urged the protesters in the union building to remain nonviolent.

On May 7th, a group of fifteen student protesters traveled to Santa Fe to speak with Gov. Cargo regarding the strike and were able to extract the promise that the National Guard would not be called in unless there appeared to be a serious threat to life or property. On May 8th, a discussion was held among the University Regents regarding the occupation of the Student Union, with the decision being made that legal action should be taken to end the occupation, and the process to obtain an injunction began. On that same day, Gov. Cargo, following a request from Police Chief Martin Vigil, placed the National Guard on alert for potential action and gave Chief Vigil the authority to call out the Guard.

That day, President Heady visited the Union to request that the strikers comply with the court order. After debate, around 130 students decided to stay in the Student Union, while around 300 departed to march on downtown Albuquerque. Although the regents made the subsequent decision to allow the building to remain open until the 11th and to postpone any forced evacuation, in an apparent failure of communication between the university and the police, the city and state police moved to clear the Union on the afternoon of the 8th in accordance with the court order. State Police Chief Martin Vigil also called in the National Guard to assist with this process. The police were the first to arrive, and 131 protesters were arrested in total. According to reports, there was no threat of violence, and the strikers did not resist arrest. However, shortly after the police arrived, the National Guard also arrived on campus.

While the police were arresting protesters, a crowd had gathered outside the union, a reportedly peaceful one that included news reporters, teachers, and uninvolved observers. Upon arrival, the National Guard set up a defensive line of bayonets, before rushing the crowd, stabbing those in their path. 10 people were injured in total, including Bill Norlander, a television reporter, Sonny Flowers, a student on crutches, Steve Sullivan, a student who was stabbed as he attempted to help Flowers, and Mary Borkless, a student photographer attempting to document the event. This show of force worked to both quickly clear the crowd, as well as dissuade protesters from continuing their activities.

Following these events, the university, the state government, and the police all faced a great deal of criticism. Calls were made for President Heady’s removal, although he denied any knowledge of the National Guards’ plan to come to the campus. The university re-opened shortly afterward. Both the State Police and Chief Vigil defended the events that took place, with the police claiming that the actions were justified due to false reports of strikers possessing weapons. Several of the victims of the stabbings sued the state later in the year, the case was dismissed because the state was absolved of responsibility for the actions of the National Guard.

Discussion Questions for Students:

  • Why do people protest? Do protests work? Is there a better way to advocate for change? Has anyone here participated in a protest?
  • Why do you think that the National Guard was called out to subdue the protests? Was it necessary? If it wasn’t necessary, then what other reasons could there be for calling in the National Guard?
  • In some of the photos you can see that pro-war protesters seem to be aligning themselves with a certain idea of America. Why do you think that they are doing this? What is the context and political value of this stance?
  • In order for the photos that we see to exist, someone  had to choose to take them in the middle of a hectic moment. Why do you think that whoever took these photos chose to do so? What value does a photo have in documenting moments like these? Should the photographer have intervened instead of taking the photo?
  • When considering these photos, keep in mind that someone made a choice to take them in the way that they did. Think about the way that the photos are framed, or what perspective they are from. What message do we think that the person taking the photos was trying to get across?
  • Have you heard about these protests before? If not, why do think you haven’t heard about this?

Bibliography & Additional Resources

Beaudet, Christopher. “Eleven Bayonetted and 131 Arrested at Student Union Building”. UNM Over the

Years: People, Places, and Events. 2021. https://timeline.unm.edu/item/eleven-bayonetted- and-131-arrested-at-student-union-building.html

Hall, Mitchell K. “The Vietnam Era Antiwar Movement.” OAH Magazine of History 18, no. 5 (2004): 13- 17 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25163716.

Heineman, Kenneth J. “Students and the Anti-War Movement”. Bill of Rights Institute, https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/students-and-the-anti-war-movement

Horn, Calvin. The University in Turmoil: Crisis Decades at the University of New Mexico. Albuquerque: Rocky Mountain Publishing Co., 1981. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiarticle=1006&context=archives_documents

Miller, Amanda. “May 1970 Student Antiwar Strikes”. Mapping American Social Movements Project.  https://depts.washington.edu/moves/antiwar_may1970.shtml

Nathanson, Rick. “Bayonetting Victims Recall 50th Anniversary of Bloodshed at UNM”. Albuquerque  Journal (May 2020). https://www.abqjournal.com/news/local/bayoneting-victims-recall-50th-anniversary-of-bloodshed-at-unm/article_022fa3b8-7319-5832-a34f-24bb2071b360.html

Pruitt, Sarah. “Kent State Shootings: A Timeline of the Tragedy”. History. May 1, 2020.          https://www.history.com/news/kent-state-shootings-timeline

University of New Mexico. New Mexico Lobo 73, no. 131 (May 1970): 1-8.         https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=daily_lobo_1970

University of New Mexico. New Mexico Lobo 73, no. 132 (May 1970): 1-8.          https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiarticle=1065&context=daily_lobo_1970

University of New Mexico. New Mexico Lobo 73, no 133 (May 1970): 1-8.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1066&context=daily_lobo_1970

University of New Mexico. New Mexico Lobo 73, no 134 (May 1970): 1-8.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1067&context=daily_lobo_1970

University of New Mexico. New Mexico Lobo 73, no 135 (May 1970): 1-8. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=daily_lobo_1970

Discussion

0 comments

Logged in as:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *